The Clash with the BBC over diamonds.

 

 

Janine Roberts.

For details of a recent agreement between De Beers and the BBC, involving both the Oppenheimers and John Birt's office - read on. This is the first public account of what transpired when the BBC backed an investigation of De Beers by an independent film company.

But if you haven't yet read Jan's account of of her earlier work as a writer and filmmaker, please read it first by clicking here. .

As you will have read in her resume, all was going very well for her when her diamond investigative series got under way. This is a brief synopsis:-
SUMMARY OF INITIAL EVENTS ON FILM. 1987 ABC commits to put major resources into producing a three part series written by Jan Roberts on the international diamond cartel. The series is called "The Diamond Empire." 1988. WGBH "Frontline" pre-purchase the USA rights within a week of seeing the script.

1990 the BBC commits to the Series three days after reading the script. 1991 BBC Enterprises commits to international marketing of the Diamond Empire Series. Australian funders Film Finance Corporation, Film Victoria and AFC join funding consortium.

November 1991. Pre-production commences of "The Diamond Empire". Estimated delivery time January 1994. It is to be shot in five continents.

This is perhaps the most international and expensive of investigative series ever committed to by the BBC. It is pre-sold by Jan to American, Swedish, Dutch and Australian Television. BBC Enterprises predict it will sell to all parts of the world. The BBC and WGBH Boston sign letters saying that Jan Roberts and her company will be in creative and managerial control of the film. Her credits will be that of producer and writer. On the basis of these letters, the Australian government invests more money than the BBC in her film. (It only invests in films in which Australian residents have a major role). Jan feels she is flying high. Production starts. She produces major shoots in the diamond districts of the US and in India. The shoots come in on budget.


________________________

Then it gets dangerous....

A condition was set for some of the Australian government funding - she must insure her life for the value of the government's investment because of the perils she will face on her investigation of the diamond cartel. Jan thought this over-paranoid.

But, in the midst of filming , the Oppenheimers, the family controlling De Beers and the diamond empire, put pressure on the BBC. The BBC begin to buck. They tell her to leave the film to the BBC to make and offer her a book contract instead. She is told, if she does not agree, her film will be ended. They propose to replace her with a British producer and journalist. She is then sexually and violently assaulted by a gang of strangers who come to her home looking for her. Next day she is told that the BBC are demanding she totally gives the film to them. If she doesn't, the film project will be ended. She takes the BBC to arbitration.

The beating inflicted on her leads to her falling critically ill with pulmonary emboli. On the day when in hospital she is told she is critically ill and could die at any time, lawyers acting under direction of John Birt's office at the top of the BBC demand she agrees to being replaced as producer - and that she drops her arbitration action against the BBC. As she now realises that no matter how strong her will, her body is not as strong and that the strain of resisting the BBC could effectvely kill her, she decides she must put her health first and gives the film to the BBC. The BBC agree in writing that they will send her by airmail all the research she needs for her book on the diamond trade if she signs - but once she signs, she does not hear from the BBC again. She is two months in hospital. She resolves to write the story nonetheless. The BBC tell De Beers that she has been removed from the production.

Researching why the BBC were so insistent on her removal and why it refused to give reasons, she learns that the Oppenheimer family attacked her in meetings with BBC, complaining that she was "obsessed" with investigating the diamond trade.(That is, she will not go away.) The film is completed by the BBC in her absence. It is then first shown in the US - and despite her having produced many of the scenes in the film, her credits have practically vanished. When she asks why, she is told the BBC gave instructions to remove her producer and journalist credits.

At her request the General Secretary of the Broadcasting and Entertainment Industry Trade Union, the powerful BECTU, contacts high officers of the BBC asking that she be given the proper credit for her work. On the Friday before her film is shown, a senior officer of the BBC phones her to tell her that while the BBC did not deny that she produced part of the film, and was the senior journalist, it refuses to give her any credit for this work on the film. He says the BBC is justified in its stand by the document she signed in hospital. She is extremely perplexed by this. Why is the BBC so adamant not to give her credit for work they acknowledged she had performed. Even tea-boys get credits on films.

When the film series is shown on the BBC, in a censored version with a third of the content missing - but much substantially as she wrote it, with her credited as the originator rather than the producer, solicitors acting for De Beers write to the BBC indignantly complaining that the BBC had promised to remove her name from the film. The BBC (who do not own the film - it is owned by the Australian government investors - the BBC only bought UK transmission rights) then make a deal with De Beers saying they will not sell her film to any other country. The BBC tells her that the Australian government investors agree with this decision. This blocks her film being shown in South Africa and Holland - both of which had asked for it - and in the rest of the world. In Australia the ABC withdraw this $A1.6 million dollar series at the last minute despite it being shown in the US and UK withouit legal damages having to be paid. The film remains buried as of January 1998.

But despite this, she does all she can to get the film out to more viewers- and to complete her book on De Beers. When De Beers tries to ban the American version of her film from being shown in the diamond rush area of Arctic Canada, their heavy handed action leads to the Federation of Trade Unions, the local environmental organisation, Ecology North and the Dene Indians inviting her to speak to her film. She is flown to Yellowknife. Her film is put on in the largest hall in town and it is standing room only. Later she is the guest of Dene Indians, goes out with dog teams, falls in love with a beautiful frozen land and sky. (See the article on this web site on Frozen diamonds)

When she goes to South Africa and Namibia to research her diamond book, she shows her film on De Beers property to the mine workers. De Beers tries unsuccessfully to ban her from several mines. The Union says she is the first person banned by De Beers since the Emergency of 1988!

1995 The World Council of Churches agrees to requests from her to help fund the first post apartheid miners' conference for Southern Africa. She is a guest key note speaker.at this conference held in Namibia. While in Namibia she assists with a two part series on Namibia's diamonds broadcast on Namibian TV. After she attacks the role of a diamond merchant (well known as a companion of Jackie Onassis Kennedy) and for employing former US intelligence agents, an American government agent warns her that her every word is being reported to Washington. The World Council of Churches also gives on her request seed money towards the setting up of a Centre for Economic Reform in South Africa.

1996. Her book "Glitter and Greed" on the world diamond trade is completed. It contains all that has been censored from the BBC film - and much more. The book tells of major international fraud, it shows how the White House has been manipulated, the Kennedies used in and out of office, Clinton's recent role, the roles played by international figures, the underside of the diamond Syndicate.

The book is now with agents seeking a publisher - a taster of this book is on this web-site. It is the "crocodile Dundee story of investigative journalism telling how the hunt of the diamond cartel took her from the Australian outback to 5th Avenue. It is substantial and her best work. She remains determined not to let De Beers silence her

She has been writing in the meantime as a freelance for a major UK newspaper l- with several top-of-front page stories. (These also caused a parliamentary debate) She also writes about the threats faced by the Dene Indians in Northern Canada from diamond mining, about cyanide spills in rainforest - and the threats posed by mining practices in West Papua where live a sister people to Australia's Aborigines. These stories are here, in Jan's Library.

Now the above is the story of my working life - as a writer, a freelance investigative journalist tilting at the big and powerful. But there's a lot I haven't yet told. Read on if you would like a more personal history of how I came to change my Gender role before starting work with the media - and how I started to work as a priestess and witch active in the environmental movement in the UK - while still continuing my investigative work for television.Click here.

 

 

To return to the Web Inquirer

Click Here to go to the Gender Issues room.

Transporter back to the Coffee Shop

Click to return to the Library Entrance.

To Contact Jani Roberts